Guide · Psychology
What Is
“You never listen.” Or: “When the television is on during dinner, I feel lonely, because I’d like us to talk. Could we turn it off while we eat?” Both sentences can be about the same evening. The second one is Nonviolent Communication. Below are its four steps, where the method comes from, what the research says about it, and the six books I would hand you if it caught your interest. Only one of them has the method in its title.
By Lisanne Swart · Psychology · Updated October 2026 · about 8 minutes
Quick answer
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) is a way of talking about conflict without blame, developed by the American psychologist Marshall Rosenberg from the 1960s onwards. It has four steps: say what you observed, name what you feel, name the need behind the feeling, and make a concrete request. The steps take an afternoon to learn and much longer to use in the middle of an argument, which is what the six books further down are about.
- The four steps · what to say, in what order
- Try it this week · four ways to start small
- Where it comes from · Marshall Rosenberg and the giraffe
- Does it work? · what the research says
- If you want to go further · six books, most not about NVC by name
- Questions people ask
The 4 Steps of Nonviolent Communication
Rosenberg’s method separates what happened from what you make of it, and what you feel from what you need. The steps go in this order, although once you know them they usually fit into a single sentence.
Step 1
Observation
Say what happened, without a verdict attached. “You’re always late” is a judgement; “you arrived twenty minutes after the time we agreed” is an observation. Rosenberg thought this was the step people skip most, and the one that decides whether the other person listens or starts defending themselves.
“When I saw the report came in after the deadline…”
Step 2
Feeling
Name what you felt, not what you think the other person did to you. “I felt anxious” is a feeling. “I felt ignored” sounds like one, but it is really a description of someone else’s behaviour, and it lands as an accusation.
“…I felt stressed…”
Step 3
Need
Name the need underneath the feeling: reliability, rest, respect, connection, being taken seriously. In Rosenberg’s view, every feeling points to a need that is being met or not, and most arguments repeat because nobody ever says the need out loud.
“…because I need to be able to count on the team…”
Step 4
Request
Ask for something specific that the other person can actually do. “Communicate more” is a wish; “could you message me when you’re going to be more than ten minutes late?” is a request. And it has to be a real request: if a no gets punished, it was a demand.
“…Next time, could you let me know a day in advance if you’re going to miss a deadline?”
“When I saw the report came in after the deadline, I felt stressed, because I need to be able to count on the team. Next time, could you let me know a day in advance if you’re going to miss a deadline?”
If You Only Read One
Knowing the four steps is not the hard part; using them is. This is the book I would start with.
If you want the method from the man who made it
Nonviolent Communication
“This is where everything on this list begins. The framework is correct. What it doesn’t explain is why your body refuses to cooperate when it matters most.”
How to Practise It This Week
Most people understand the steps the first time they read them and still can’t find them when they need them. A few things that make it easier:
- Start small. Try the four steps on the dishes before you try them on the biggest fight of your year.
- Write it down first. While you are learning, put the sentence on paper before you say it. Knowing the structure and saying it out loud are two different skills.
- Use it on yourself first. Before you name a need to someone else, try to name it to yourself: what did I see, what did I feel, what do I need?
- Expect it to disappear mid-argument. When your body is in fight-or-flight mode, careful language is the first thing to go. That is not a failure of the method; it is why I put a book about the nervous system on this page.
Where Nonviolent Communication Comes From
Marshall B. Rosenberg was born in 1934 in Canton, Ohio, and earned a PhD in clinical psychology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1961, where he studied under Carl Rogers, the founder of person-centred therapy. Rogers’s emphasis on empathic listening runs all through NVC.
The method took shape in the late 1960s, when Rosenberg was working on the racial integration of schools in the American South. A first version appeared in a training manual in 1972. In 1984 he founded the Center for Nonviolent Communication, which still certifies trainers around the world, and in 1999 he published the book that made the method famous, Nonviolent Communication. He died in 2015 in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
In his workshops Rosenberg used two hand puppets. The jackal spoke the language of judging and blaming. The giraffe, with its large heart, spoke NVC, which is why you will sometimes hear it called giraffe language.
Does It Work? What the Research Says
Partly, and it is worth being precise. A randomised study of French medical students found that NVC training increased their self-reported empathy three months later. A study of inmates in Washington State who took NVC classes found lower reoffending, and a 2024 review of studies among healthcare workers found better working relationships and less conflict.
But most of the studies are small and short, they use very different designs, and reviewers keep calling for bigger and longer trials. There are criticisms too: saying feelings out loud can feel intrusive in cultures where people don’t, empathy does not fix an imbalance of power, and NVC taught as a script can sound stiff or even manipulative. The fairest summary is: widely used, promising, not proven.
If You Want to Go Further: Six Books
Rosenberg first, then five books that explain why his steps are so hard to use: attachment, anger, the anatomy of a hard conversation and the body. Only the first is about NVC by name.
Where it starts
Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life
The book in which Rosenberg sets out the whole method: the four steps, the difference between a feeling and a judgement, how to listen with empathy and how to say no. It came out in 1999; the third edition is from 2015.
If you have read it and found yourself thinking “I know this, but I still can’t do it”, that is exactly what the rest of this list addresses.— Lisanne
Couples · Attachment
Hold Me Tight
A couples therapist on the fight underneath the fight. Drawing on attachment theory, Johnson argues that most arguments between people who love each other are a protest, a way of asking: are you there for me?
Rosenberg gives you the words. This book explains why you needed them in the first place.— Lisanne
Practical · Work and home
Difficult Conversations
Three researchers from the Harvard Negotiation Project show that every hard conversation is really three at once: what happened, how each person feels about it, and what it says about who they are.
If NVC gives you the language, this book gives you the architecture. The most immediately applicable book on this list if you have a specific conversation you are dreading.— Lisanne
Anger · Relationships
The Dance of Anger
A psychologist’s classic about anger as information: a sign that something important to you is being crossed. Lerner shows what happens when people either explode or swallow it, and what the alternative looks like.
NVC asks you to separate observation from evaluation, feeling from judgement. Lerner shows you what happens when you can’t, and why.— Lisanne
Attachment styles
Attached
A psychiatrist and a psychologist translate attachment research into three styles, anxious, avoidant and secure, and show how they collide in the same relationship and sometimes in the same sentence.
NVC asks you to make needs explicit. This book explains why so many people cannot.— Lisanne
Trauma · The body
The Body Keeps the Score
A psychiatrist’s account of how trauma lives on in the body and the nervous system, and of the treatments he has seen help. Some researchers think it overstates parts of the science, so read it as one clinician’s case.
This is the book that explains why NVC fails in the moment even when you know the techniques perfectly.— Lisanne
→ See the full reading list on nonviolent communication, with where to start
Frequently asked questions about Nonviolent Communication
What is Nonviolent Communication?
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) is a method for talking about conflict without blame, developed by the American psychologist Marshall Rosenberg in the 1960s and 1970s. It has four steps: observe without judging, name your feeling, name the need behind it, and make a clear request.
What are the 4 steps of Nonviolent Communication?
Observation (what happened, without judgement), feeling (the emotion it caused), need (what the feeling points to) and request (something concrete the other person can do). Rosenberg meant them to be said in that order, though people who use them a lot often fold them into one sentence.
Who created Nonviolent Communication?
Marshall B. Rosenberg (1934–2015), an American clinical psychologist who studied under Carl Rogers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He began developing the method in the late 1960s while working on the racial integration of schools in the American South, founded the Center for Nonviolent Communication in 1984 and published Nonviolent Communication in 1999.
What do the giraffe and the jackal mean in Nonviolent Communication?
Rosenberg used two animals to show two ways of talking. The jackal stands for language that judges, blames and dominates. The giraffe, with its large heart and a long neck to see far ahead, stands for NVC. That is why NVC is sometimes called giraffe language.
Is Nonviolent Communication the same as compassionate communication?
Yes. Compassionate communication is one of several other names for NVC, along with giraffe language and collaborative communication. The first edition of Rosenberg’s book was subtitled A Language of Compassion; later editions use A Language of Life.
Is Nonviolent Communication evidence-based?
Partly. Studies have found benefits in specific settings, for example more empathy among medical students in a French trial and lower reoffending among prison inmates in Washington State, but most studies are small and short, and reviewers describe the evidence as limited. It is best described as widely used and promising rather than proven.
What are the criticisms of Nonviolent Communication?
The main ones: the research base is small; its focus on saying feelings out loud can feel intrusive in cultures where that is not the norm; empathy alone does not fix an imbalance of power; and when it is taught as a script, it can sound unnatural or even manipulative.
How do you practise Nonviolent Communication in daily life?
Start with small, low-stakes moments rather than your biggest conflict, write the four-step sentence down before you say it while you are learning, and try it on yourself first. Expect it to desert you in a heated moment; that is normal, and it is exactly what the books on this page are about.
What is the best book on Nonviolent Communication?
Start with Marshall Rosenberg’s own Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life, which explains the whole method. If you want to understand why it is so hard to use when it matters, read Hold Me Tight by Sue Johnson or The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk next.
Footnotes
- Nonviolent Communication — Wikipedia
- Marshall Rosenberg — Wikipedia
- Center for Nonviolent Communication
- Marshall Rosenberg — Wikiquote
Facts on this page are checked against the sources above. Last checked October 2026.
Written by Lisanne Swart, who has curated reading lists and author guides at lisanneswart.com since 2021.
See more on her personal bookshelf.
“Most of us grew up speaking a language that encourages us to label, compare, demand, and pronounce judgements.”
— Marshall B. Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life
If this page interested you, the bookshelf has more: reading lists by theme, author guides, and notes on what is actually worth your time.
Browse the full bookshelf Get book recommendations