Reading List

Authors Like George Orwell

Orwell destroyed every literary manuscript he ever wrote except one. It survives at Brown University, about half the text of Nineteen Eighty-Four, covered in corrections in his own hand — including the first line, which began life as “It was a cold day in early April, and a million radios were striking thirteen” and became “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen”. He wrote most of it on the Scottish island of Jura between 1946 and 1948, seriously ill with tuberculosis, widowed, raising an adopted son alone, typing the final draft himself because he could not find anyone to come to the island. It was published in June 1949 and he died seven months later, aged forty-six. The rest of the work is nine books of reporting, essays and fiction that keep arriving at the same question: Down and Out in Paris and London, The Road to Wigan Pier, Homage to Catalonia — written after he was shot through the throat in Spain and then hunted by the side he had fought for — and Animal Farm. He had also spent two years at the BBC writing wartime propaganda, and modelled the Ministry of Truth on it. The ten below are chosen on the machinery of power and on who is telling you the truth.

By Lisanne Swart · 10 authors · Political writing · Nine books · Jura, 1946–48 · Updated September 2026


Quick answer

The closest match is Arthur Koestler, whose novel about a Bolshevik awaiting execution Orwell reviewed and never got over. Behind them both stands the Russian novel that started it, written in 1921. Three writers explain how totalitarianism actually works rather than imagining it, two carry the dystopia forward, and one wrote to Orwell in 1949 to tell him the boot was the wrong prediction.

Every book by George Orwell →

Where to start if you loved George Orwell

If you want the closest match, read Arthur Koestler.

Darkness at Noon. An old Bolshevik argued into confessing, by logic rather than pain.

If you want the book behind the book, read Yevgeny Zamyatin.

We. A glass city and numbered citizens, written in 1921.

If you want to know how it works, read Hannah Arendt.

The Origins of Totalitarianism. The structure underneath the boot.

If you want the people it happened to, read Svetlana Alexievich.

Secondhand Time. Hundreds of voices, nostalgic and contradictory and real.

If you want the argument against him, read Aldous Huxley.

Brave New World. Control by pleasure, from the man who taught him French.

If you want more books of this kind

My shelf of the best fiction has the rest.

10 authors like George Orwell

01
The novel he never got over · Closest match

Arthur Koestler

Hungarian-British · Darkness at Noon (1940), Spanish Testament (1937)

Darkness at Noon is an old Bolshevik named Rubashov, arrested by the revolution he helped make, interrogated in a cell, and gradually argued into confessing to crimes he did not commit — not by torture but by the logic of the Party he still believes in. Koestler had been a Communist, had been imprisoned under sentence of death in the Spanish Civil War, and wrote the book in German while fleeing France. Orwell reviewed it and called it brilliant. He died in 1983.

The single closest match, and the direct ancestor of the interrogation scenes in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Both men had believed in the left, gone to Spain, and come back with the same discovery: that the machinery which frightens them is not brutality but a system of reasoning that swallows the person using it. Koestler is the better philosopher of the two; Orwell is the better prose writer. Read Darkness at Noon first.

— Lisanne
02
Older than the genre · The book behind the book

Yevgeny Zamyatin

Russian · We (written 1920–21)

We is set in the One State, a glass city where citizens have numbers instead of names, live on a timetable, and are permitted sexual appointments by ticket; the narrator is an engineer building a spaceship who begins keeping a journal and falls in love. It was the first book banned by the Soviet censorship board, circulated abroad, and Zamyatin was allowed to leave for Paris in 1931, where he died in 1937. Orwell reviewed it in 1946, while writing his own.

The origin of the whole tradition, and Orwell read it during the composition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. Everything is already here in 1921: the transparent surveillance, the state ownership of desire, the rebellion that is absorbed rather than defeated. Orwell also used his review to note that Huxley's Brave New World owed it a debt Huxley never acknowledged. Read it and you can see both later books being assembled.

— Lisanne
03
How it actually works

Hannah Arendt

German-American · The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963)

Arendt fled Germany in 1933, was interned in France, escaped to New York in 1941, and wrote the book that first argued Nazism and Stalinism were a single new kind of regime rather than two old ones — built on loneliness, terror and an ideology that explains everything. Covering Eichmann's trial for The New Yorker in 1961, she produced the phrase the banality of evil, and was attacked for decades over it.

The analysis underneath Orwell's fiction, written two years after it. What Orwell renders as a boot on a face, Arendt explains as a structure: why totalitarian movements need permanent motion, why they attack facts rather than merely lying, why isolation is a precondition. If the two-minutes hate and the memory hole are what stayed with you, this is what they are made of. It is demanding and it is the real thing.

— Lisanne
Every book by Hannah Arendt →

Authors like Hannah Arendt →

04
Why clever people go along with it

Czesław Miłosz

Polish · The Captive Mind (1953)

Miłosz served the postwar Polish communist government as a cultural attaché in Washington and Paris, defected in 1951, and then wrote a short book about four Polish writers he knew, disguised under Greek letters, tracing exactly how each one talked himself into collaboration — not from fear alone but from a genuine wish to be on the side of history. He received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1980 and died in 2004.

The question Orwell can only dramatise, answered by someone who watched it from inside. Nineteen Eighty-Four shows a man broken; The Captive Mind shows intelligent, decent writers converting themselves, over months, with arguments they find persuasive. It is the most uncomfortable book on this page because nobody in it is a monster. Read it after Koestler.

— Lisanne
Every book by Czesław Miłosz →
05
The testimony

Svetlana Alexievich

Belarusian · Voices from Chernobyl (1997), Secondhand Time (2013)

Alexievich builds books out of hundreds of interviews, edited and arranged so that ordinary people describe enormous events in their own words: the women who fought in the Second World War, the soldiers sent to Afghanistan, the families around Chernobyl, and in Secondhand Time the Soviet citizens left standing when the country they had been built for disappeared. She received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2015 and has lived under pressure and in exile from Belarus.

What the regimes Orwell imagined left behind, told by the people it happened to. Secondhand Time is the most useful correction to any dystopia: the survivors do not speak in slogans, they are nostalgic and contradictory and frequently miss the thing that ruined them. Orwell gives you the system; Alexievich gives you the fifteen hundred voices that lived in it.

— Lisanne
Every book by Svetlana Alexievich →

Authors like Svetlana Alexievich →

06
The dystopia, continued

Margaret Atwood

Canadian · The Handmaid's Tale (1985), The Testaments (2019)

The Handmaid's Tale imagines a theocratic United States in which fertile women are assigned to households as property, and Atwood has said repeatedly that she put nothing in it that had not already happened somewhere. The novel ends with an academic conference centuries later picking over the narrator's recording, a device borrowed directly from Orwell's appendix on Newspeak. The Testaments shared the Booker Prize in 2019.

The clearest inheritance, and Atwood has named the debt: the historical notes at the end of her novel do exactly what Orwell's essay on Newspeak does, telling you in the past tense that the regime eventually fell. Her rule — invent nothing — is Orwell's rule too. She is the better novelist of character; he is the better analyst of language. Read The Handmaid's Tale, then his appendix again.

— Lisanne
Every book by Margaret Atwood →

Authors like Margaret Atwood →

07
The quiet version

Kazuo Ishiguro

British · Never Let Me Go (2005), Klara and the Sun (2021)

Never Let Me Go is narrated by a young woman raised at an English boarding school where the children are being prepared for something the reader works out long before anyone says it, in a voice so mild and so loyal to the institution that the horror arrives sideways. Ishiguro received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2017, and The Remains of the Day won the Booker Prize in 1989.

The opposite technique to the same end. Orwell shows you a regime and names it; Ishiguro shows you people who have absorbed one so completely that they explain it to you as normal, and never rebel. There is no Room 101 because none is needed. If what frightened you in Nineteen Eighty-Four was Winston's final state rather than the torture that produced it, this is the book.

— Lisanne
Every book by Kazuo Ishiguro →

Authors like Kazuo Ishiguro →

08
Burning the books

Ray Bradbury

American · Fahrenheit 451 (1953), The Martian Chronicles (1950)

Fahrenheit 451 is a fireman whose job is to burn books in a society where nobody much wants them anyway, kept happy by wall-sized screens and earpieces that never stop talking. Bradbury wrote the first draft on a rented typewriter in a university basement for ten cents a half hour. He always insisted the book was about television and distraction rather than state censorship, which readers keep forgetting.

The American entry in the same argument, and the one that got the mechanism right for a consumer society. Orwell's state suppresses the past; Bradbury's population simply stops caring about it, and the firemen arrive only after the audience has already gone. Read it next to Brave New World rather than next to Nineteen Eighty-Four, and the pairing explains a great deal about the present.

— Lisanne
Every book by Ray Bradbury →
09
His best reader

Christopher Hitchens

British-American · Why Orwell Matters (2002), Hitch-22 (2010)

Why Orwell Matters takes on everyone who has tried to claim Orwell — conservatives, the left, the anti-communist right — and argues that what made him valuable was a refusal of exactly that kind of team loyalty. Hitchens wrote essays and polemic for four decades, changed sides on several major questions, most visibly over the invasion of Iraq, and lost a great many friends for it. He died in 2011.

The clearest guide to what Orwell was actually doing, by someone who modelled his own career on it. Hitchens is at his best on the essays rather than the novels, and on the awkward fact that Orwell is quoted approvingly by people who would have loathed him. Read this before you read anyone else telling you what Orwell would have thought about the present.

— Lisanne
10
The argument against him

Aldous Huxley

British · Brave New World (1932), The Doors of Perception (1954)

Brave New World imagines a stable world state that controls people through pleasure rather than fear: engineered classes, conditioned desires, casual sex, and a drug called soma that removes any wish to object. Huxley had taught Orwell French at Eton. In October 1949 he wrote to his former pupil praising Nineteen Eighty-Four and then disagreeing with it — the ruling oligarchy, he suggested, would find less arduous ways of governing than the boot.

The rival prediction, made by his old French master, in writing, four months after publication. Orwell's regime holds power by terror, scarcity and pain; Huxley's holds it by comfort, distraction and consent, which costs less and provokes nothing. Seventy-seven years on, the honest answer is that both got something right and Huxley got more of it. Read the two together; it is the most useful pairing in twentieth-century fiction.

— Lisanne

Every book by Aldous Huxley →

Frequently asked questions about authors like George Orwell

Who should I read if I love George Orwell?

Arthur Koestler is the closest — Orwell reviewed Darkness at Noon and its interrogations run straight into Nineteen Eighty-Four. Yevgeny Zamyatin's We, written in 1921, is the book behind both. For how totalitarianism actually operates, Hannah Arendt on the structure and Czesław Miłosz on why intelligent people collaborate, with Svetlana Alexievich for the testimony of those who lived through it. Margaret Atwood and Kazuo Ishiguro carry the dystopia forward, Ray Bradbury got the consumer version right, and Christopher Hitchens is the best guide to Orwell himself. Aldous Huxley is the argument against.

Which Orwell should I start with?

Animal Farm (1945) if you want the short one: about a hundred pages, a farm, and the clearest account of a revolution eating itself ever written. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) if you want the famous one, and be warned that the last third is genuinely distressing. But the non-fiction is where many readers end up living: Homage to Catalonia (1938) on Spain and Down and Out in Paris and London (1933) on poverty are better prose than either novel, and the essays — “Politics and the English Language”, “Shooting an Elephant” — are the best of all.

What did Huxley actually write to Orwell?

In October 1949, four months after publication, Huxley wrote to Orwell — whom he had taught French at Eton — praising the book and then dissenting from it. His argument was that a ruling oligarchy would eventually find less arduous ways of governing than the boot and the interrogation cell, because control through conditioning and gratification is cheaper and provokes no resistance. It is the most famous disagreement in modern dystopian fiction, and it is worth forming your own view on who was closer.

Why does Orwell get quoted by everyone?

Because he attacked his own side as hard as the other one, which leaves plenty for anyone to quote. He was a democratic socialist who wrote the century's two most effective anti-communist books; he despised imperialism while having served the empire as a policeman in Burma; he wrote against euphemism in a language now full of the word Orwellian. Christopher Hitchens's Why Orwell Matters is the best treatment of the problem, and its conclusion is that the refusal to belong is the point.

What was the list he gave to the government?

In 1949, seriously ill, Orwell gave a Foreign Office unit called the Information Research Department a list of some thirty-five writers and public figures he considered unsuitable as anti-communist propagandists, with private notes on several of them. It became public in 1996 and 2003 and has been argued about ever since — whether it was a blacklist, a private opinion solicited by a friend, or an old man's error. The list existed, the names were real, and no one was prosecuted as a result. It belongs in any honest account of him.

Is Nineteen Eighty-Four accurate about the present?

Partly, and less than the quoting suggests. The permanent surveillance, the rewriting of records and the attack on the idea of verifiable fact have all arrived in forms he would recognise. The mechanism has not: the modern versions run largely on commercial data collection and voluntary participation rather than on a Ministry with a boot, which is precisely Huxley's objection. Reading both, plus Arendt on why regimes attack facts rather than simply lying, is more useful than either alone.

What happened to his manuscripts?

He destroyed them. The only literary manuscript of Orwell's that survives is roughly half of Nineteen Eighty-Four, held at Brown University since 1992, heavily corrected in his hand — it shows the famous opening line in its earlier form, and the first appearances of Newspeak and of Big Brother. Everything else he burned or threw away, which is its own small comment from a man who wrote a novel about the deliberate destruction of the record.

What order should I read him in?

Start with the essays, which are free almost everywhere and take twenty minutes each. Then Animal Farm, then Homage to Catalonia, then Nineteen Eighty-Four, then The Road to Wigan Pier — whose second half is an argument with English socialists that still causes fights. The early novels, Burmese Days and Keep the Aspidistra Flying, are for when you already care.

From the bookshelf

“It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.”

— George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four, 1949.

If this shelf interested you, the full bookshelf has more: reading lists by theme, author guides, and notes on what is actually worth your time.

Browse the full bookshelf Get book recommendations
Start Typing