What Is Absurdism?

Where the idea comes from

The idea of the absurd predates Camus. The nineteenth-century Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard is usually regarded as its starting point: in Fear and Trembling (1843) he used the story of Abraham to explore faith that defies reason. For Kierkegaard, the absurd was something to be met with a religious leap; later thinkers kept the problem but rejected that answer. Kierkegaard is also counted among the first existentialists, which is one reason the two traditions are so often confused.

Absurdism as a named position belongs to Albert Camus. In the essay The Myth of Sisyphus and the novel The Stranger, both published in 1942, he described the absurd not as a property of the world or of people alone, but as the confrontation between human need and what he called the unreasonable silence of the world. On this view, meaning lives neither in the mind nor in the world alone, but in their encounter.

Camus and the philosophy of the absurd

The Myth of Sisyphus opens by asking whether life is worth living once one accepts that it has no built-in meaning. Camus considers three responses. Physical suicide he rejects as a surrender. So-called philosophical suicide, a leap of faith into religion or a system that promises ultimate meaning, he rejects as an evasion. What remains is revolt: facing the absurd with full awareness while continuing to live passionately and freely.

His emblem is Sisyphus, condemned to roll a boulder uphill for ever. Camus ends the essay with the line ‘one must imagine Sisyphus happy’. He developed these ideas further in The Plague (1947) and The Rebel (1951), and received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1957. Critics often read his fiction as dramatising in story form the argument his essays make philosophically.

Key ideas

• The absurd — Not meaninglessness as such, but the conflict between the human desire for meaning and a world that gives no answer.
• No escape routes — Camus rejects both suicide and philosophical suicide, the leap of faith that resolves the tension by fiat.
• Revolt — Living with the absurd in full awareness, without hope of final justification, is presented as the honest response.
• Freedom and passion — Once no higher purpose is assumed, life can be lived intensely and on one’s own terms.
• Not nihilism — Camus explicitly did not embrace nihilism; he treated human values and freedom as worth defending.

The Theatre of the Absurd

The critic Martin Esslin coined the phrase ‘Theatre of the Absurd’ in a 1960 essay and expanded it into a 1961 book of the same name. He grouped together Samuel Beckett, Eugène Ionesco, Arthur Adamov and Jean Genet, later adding Harold Pinter, and linked their plays to Camus’s description of the human condition in The Myth of Sisyphus. The label has since become the standard way to describe this strand of post-war drama.

These playwrights did not form a school. What Esslin identified was a shared approach: characters trapped in hopeless, repetitive situations, dialogue made of clichés and nonsense that fails to communicate, cyclical plots, unexplained menace and a mix of vaudeville comedy with bleak images. Key examples include Ionesco’s The Bald Soprano (1950) and Beckett’s Waiting for Godot (premiered in Paris in 1953). Unlike Camus, these writers were generally more interested in showing the predicament than in proposing a response to it.

How absurdism shows up in fiction

Absurdist fiction centres on characters who cannot find inherent meaning in their lives, and on events that follow their own logic to an illogical end. Common features include dark humour, satire, broken causality, the absence of a conventional plot arc and no clear moral. The category overlaps heavily with the Theatre of the Absurd: Beckett, for instance, wrote novels such as The Unnamable as well as plays.

Franz Kafka is often treated as a forerunner, with The Metamorphosis (1915) and The Trial (published 1925) placing ordinary people inside inexplicable systems. Camus’s The Stranger gives the idea its classic novel form, and Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 (1961) turned it into war satire; its title became shorthand for a no-win situation built into the rules themselves. Kurt Vonnegut and Nikolai Gogol are also frequently listed among absurdist writers.

Key works

• The Metamorphosis — Franz Kafka, 1915. A man wakes up transformed into an insect and his family’s response is grimly practical, a template for absurd fiction.
• The Trial — Franz Kafka, 1925. Josef K. is arrested and prosecuted by an unreachable court for a crime that is never named.
• The Stranger — Albert Camus, 1942. Camus’s novel of the absurd, built around Meursault’s detached response to his mother’s death and a killing.
• The Myth of Sisyphus — Albert Camus, 1942. The essay that sets out absurdism as a philosophy and ends with Sisyphus imagined as happy.
• The Plague — Albert Camus, 1947. An epidemic in Oran tests how people act when suffering has no explanation.
• The Bald Soprano — Eugène Ionesco, 1950. A play of collapsing small talk that became a founding text of the Theatre of the Absurd.
• Waiting for Godot — Samuel Beckett, 1953. Two men wait for someone who never arrives, the best-known play associated with the Theatre of the Absurd.
• Rhinoceros — Eugène Ionesco, 1960. A town’s inhabitants turn into rhinoceroses one by one, often read as a parable about conformity.
• Catch-22 — Joseph Heller, 1961. A satirical war novel whose circular military logic gave English a term for absurd, no-win rules.
• Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead — Tom Stoppard, 1966. Two minor characters from Hamlet drift through a play they do not understand.

Read further